OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
wsbpel
385 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 31 Oct 2003 23:03:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 31 Oct 2003 23:00:19 -0000
TC conference calls start time
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 31 Oct 2003 20:23:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2 - A subfunction proposal
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 31 Oct 2003 18:38:12 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 31 Oct 2003 18:37:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values notdefined in portType
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 31 Oct 2003 18:33:05 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 31 Oct 2003 18:29:05 -0000
Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft.doc uploaded
From
ygoland@bea.com on 31 Oct 2003 18:26:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 31 Oct 2003 16:58:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
"Trickovic, Ivana" <ivana.trickovic@sap.com> on 31 Oct 2003 15:37:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 31 Oct 2003 15:19:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 31 Oct 2003 10:31:51 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] enableInstanceCompensation and the global compensation handler
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 31 Oct 2003 08:42:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 31 Oct 2003 08:26:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values notdefined in portType
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 31 Oct 2003 08:09:39 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] enableInstanceCompensation and the global compensationhandler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 31 Oct 2003 02:52:54 -0000
Issue - 2 - subfunctions used as conditionals
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 31 Oct 2003 00:06:01 -0000
Issue - 2 - attribute versus element based subfunction invocations
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 31 Oct 2003 00:03:25 -0000
Issue - 2 - subfunctions inside or outside of files
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 30 Oct 2003 23:54:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2 - A subfunction proposal
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 30 Oct 2003 23:51:03 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2 - A subfunction proposal
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 30 Oct 2003 22:31:05 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 30 Oct 2003 22:13:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 30 Oct 2003 21:47:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 30 Oct 2003 19:48:19 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 30 Oct 2003 16:50:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2 - A subfunction proposal
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 30 Oct 2003 14:39:25 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
tony.fletcher@choreology.com on 30 Oct 2003 13:57:55 -0000
enableInstanceCompensation and the global compensation handler
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 30 Oct 2003 01:14:52 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
Nickolas Kavantzas <nickolas.kavantzas@oracle.com> on 30 Oct 2003 00:02:50 -0000
Issue - 2 - A subfunction proposal
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 29 Oct 2003 23:52:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 29 Oct 2003 23:47:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- requirements for a sub function solution
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 29 Oct 2003 23:14:25 -0000
members in leave of absence status
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 29 Oct 2003 22:35:07 -0000
Groups - BPEL F2F Meeting added
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 29 Oct 2003 21:53:44 -0000
Groups - BPEL F2F Meeting added
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 29 Oct 2003 21:52:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 29 Oct 2003 19:03:48 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 2- sub functions
From
"Trickovic, Ivana" <ivana.trickovic@sap.com> on 29 Oct 2003 13:19:28 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 3 - Proposal to vote
From
Aniruddha Thakur <aniruddha.thakur@oracle.com> on 29 Oct 2003 02:20:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 - Proposal to vote
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 29 Oct 2003 00:14:00 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 3 - Proposal to vote
From
Aniruddha Thakur <aniruddha.thakur@oracle.com> on 28 Oct 2003 23:57:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 28 Oct 2003 22:53:55 -0000
Groups - Action Item Modified: #0002 Post documents and/or links on UN/CEFACT's Techniques and Methodologies Group (TMG), the business process working group and any other items that may help provide context to future discussions.
From
monica.martin@sun.com on 28 Oct 2003 07:30:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 27 Oct 2003 19:44:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 27 Oct 2003 19:25:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status incase of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 27 Oct 2003 19:14:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 27 Oct 2003 19:11:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status incase of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 27 Oct 2003 19:01:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 27 Oct 2003 18:15:12 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 27 Oct 2003 17:48:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 27 Oct 2003 17:46:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - (was RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings)
From
jim@parasoft.com (Jim Clune) on 27 Oct 2003 17:43:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 27 Oct 2003 17:42:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 27 Oct 2003 16:57:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 27 Oct 2003 16:57:03 -0000
Groups - WSBPEL TC meeting Notes for 15 Oct 2003.doc uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 27 Oct 2003 16:18:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 27 Oct 2003 15:43:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 27 Oct 2003 15:02:48 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - (was RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings)
From
"Maciej Szefler" <mbs@fivesight.com> on 27 Oct 2003 14:41:50 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com> on 27 Oct 2003 02:20:29 -0000
Fw: agenda for Oct 29 WS BPEL TC call
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 26 Oct 2003 21:19:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Derek Miers" <miers@enix.co.uk> on 26 Oct 2003 16:52:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 25 Oct 2003 11:46:29 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 25 Oct 2003 03:54:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 25 Oct 2003 02:49:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 25 Oct 2003 01:32:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 24 Oct 2003 23:12:45 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 24 Oct 2003 22:55:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 24 Oct 2003 22:53:31 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 24 Oct 2003 22:39:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Tony Andrews" <tandrews@microsoft.com> on 24 Oct 2003 20:27:54 -0000
Regrets for Wed 29 Oct 03
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 24 Oct 2003 20:11:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 24 Oct 2003 18:44:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 24 Oct 2003 17:25:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 24 Oct 2003 17:04:20 -0000
Issues list
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 24 Oct 2003 14:51:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Final end of scopes ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion)
From
"Haugen Robert" <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com> on 24 Oct 2003 14:35:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values notdefined in portType
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 24 Oct 2003 13:43:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] License Contact For Siebel?
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 24 Oct 2003 12:41:08 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] License Contact For Siebel?
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 24 Oct 2003 11:26:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Derek Miers" <miers@enix.co.uk> on 24 Oct 2003 10:28:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Ben Bloch" <ben_b54@hotmail.com> on 24 Oct 2003 09:44:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 24 Oct 2003 06:35:08 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 24 Oct 2003 06:16:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 24 Oct 2003 02:01:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 24 Oct 2003 00:58:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 24 Oct 2003 00:44:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Steve Capell" <steve.capell@redwahoo.com> on 23 Oct 2003 23:57:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
Jean-Jacques Dubray <jeanjadu@Attachmate.com> on 23 Oct 2003 23:39:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 23:35:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 23 Oct 2003 23:25:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Steve Capell" <steve.capell@redwahoo.com> on 23 Oct 2003 22:19:52 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 23 Oct 2003 21:52:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
Jean-Jacques Dubray <jeanjadu@Attachmate.com> on 23 Oct 2003 21:32:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Tony Andrews" <tandrews@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 20:23:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Ben Bloch" <ben_b54@hotmail.com> on 23 Oct 2003 19:57:49 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Tony Andrews" <tandrews@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 19:48:36 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 23 Oct 2003 19:31:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Tony Andrews" <tandrews@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 18:27:01 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Thu Oct 23 14:00:29 2003
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 17:38:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 23 Oct 2003 17:34:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 17:28:44 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 23 Oct 2003 17:13:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 23 Oct 2003 17:10:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 16:59:45 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 23 Oct 2003 16:43:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - (was RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings)
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 23 Oct 2003 16:23:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 23 Oct 2003 15:53:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 23 Oct 2003 13:45:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values notdefined in portType
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 23 Oct 2003 10:54:52 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks?
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 23 Oct 2003 10:48:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 23 Oct 2003 10:20:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 5 - suspend/resume - is it just an implementation question ?
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 23 Oct 2003 09:32:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Steve Capell" <steve.capell@redwahoo.com> on 23 Oct 2003 07:10:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 06:36:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Steve Capell" <steve.capell@redwahoo.com> on 23 Oct 2003 06:09:46 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - (was RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 05:37:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 03:39:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 03:36:29 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 23 Oct 2003 01:58:12 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 23 Oct 2003 01:51:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 01:33:01 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 01:23:06 -0000
RE: Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 23 Oct 2003 01:00:19 -0000
Abstract BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] FAQ)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 23:38:52 -0000
Issue - 72 - Proposal to vote
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 22:46:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 22 Oct 2003 22:24:59 -0000
Issue - 77 - Motion to require access to values not defined in portType
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 22 Oct 2003 22:23:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] FAQ
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 22 Oct 2003 22:06:18 -0000
Issue - 79 - Serializable scopes do not need to be leaf scopes
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 21:28:15 -0000
Issue - 78 - New value for initiate on multi-starts
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 21:11:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks?
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 22 Oct 2003 20:56:31 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 22 Oct 2003 20:49:05 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 22 Oct 2003 20:18:53 -0000
New Issue - Serializable scopes do not need to be leaf scopes
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 22 Oct 2003 19:47:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Oct 2003 19:40:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 22 Oct 2003 19:31:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Oct 2003 19:25:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 22 Oct 2003 18:45:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Oct 2003 17:46:13 -0000
Issue - 5 - suspend/resume - is it just an implementation question ?
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 17:35:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 22 Oct 2003 16:51:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 22 Oct 2003 16:02:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - (was RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings)
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 22 Oct 2003 15:19:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 76 - Mandating either Pessimistic or OptimisticStatic Analysis
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 22 Oct 2003 12:43:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - (was RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 08:24:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Oct 2003 06:47:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Oct 2003 06:43:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Oct 2003 06:29:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 22 Oct 2003 02:21:50 -0000
Issue - 77 - (was RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 00:11:44 -0000
Reannouncement - Issue - 77 - BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 22 Oct 2003 00:11:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 21 Oct 2003 23:52:17 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 21 Oct 2003 23:03:32 -0000
Attempt to Understand BPEL Multi-Start Behavior
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 21 Oct 2003 22:30:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 76 - Mandating either Pessimistic or Optimistic Static Analysis
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 21 Oct 2003 22:08:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 21 Oct 2003 21:58:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP headerbindings
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 21 Oct 2003 21:14:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Rajesh Pradhan" <rajesh@iopsis.com> on 21 Oct 2003 20:51:30 -0000
Issue - 78 - BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 21 Oct 2003 20:32:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 21 Oct 2003 19:54:10 -0000
FAQ
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 21 Oct 2003 19:41:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 21 Oct 2003 19:37:05 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 21 Oct 2003 19:28:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 21 Oct 2003 19:20:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 21 Oct 2003 19:19:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 21 Oct 2003 19:10:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 21 Oct 2003 18:55:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks?
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 21 Oct 2003 17:50:21 -0000
Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 21 Oct 2003 17:23:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 21 Oct 2003 17:19:58 -0000
Issue - 76 - Mandating either Pessimistic or Optimistic Static Analysis
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 21 Oct 2003 17:19:42 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 21 Oct 2003 15:42:42 -0000
Issue titles (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 76 - Mandating either Pessimistic or Optimistic Static)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 21 Oct 2003 09:45:24 -0000
Issue - 76 - Mandating either Pessimistic or Optimistic Static
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 21 Oct 2003 09:31:50 -0000
Issue - 75 - Locally Scoped partnerLink declarations
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 21 Oct 2003 09:31:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP headerbindings
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 21 Oct 2003 08:05:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
"Frank Leymann" <LEY1@de.ibm.com> on 21 Oct 2003 07:47:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 21 Oct 2003 02:19:26 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status incase of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 21 Oct 2003 01:20:22 -0000
Issue 29 - Either get rid of getVariableData or introduce a hint annotation
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 21 Oct 2003 01:16:53 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 21 Oct 2003 00:56:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 21 Oct 2003 00:07:38 -0000
Do we need the createInstance attribute?
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Oct 2003 23:45:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 20 Oct 2003 23:40:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - approved proposal.
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Oct 2003 23:40:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Oct 2003 23:21:17 -0000
Possible new issue: BPEL cannot handle some SOAP header bindings
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 20 Oct 2003 23:13:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 20 Oct 2003 22:59:30 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 20 Oct 2003 22:33:51 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 20 Oct 2003 22:31:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 20 Oct 2003 21:54:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Oct 2003 21:47:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Oct 2003 21:45:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 53 - Final end of scopes ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion)
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Oct 2003 21:35:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - approved proposal.
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 20 Oct 2003 21:17:12 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 20 Oct 2003 21:08:50 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
"Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com> on 20 Oct 2003 20:50:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 20 Oct 2003 20:38:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 20 Oct 2003 20:01:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - approved proposal.
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 20 Oct 2003 19:03:26 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 20 Oct 2003 18:05:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 20 Oct 2003 17:36:39 -0000
XPath expressions was: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 20 Oct 2003 14:20:11 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status incase of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 20 Oct 2003 14:19:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - approved proposal.
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 20 Oct 2003 11:19:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 19 Oct 2003 23:54:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 19 Oct 2003 18:30:30 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
jim@parasoft.com (Jim Clune) on 17 Oct 2003 21:07:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Oct 2003 20:55:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 17 Oct 2003 20:20:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Oct 2003 16:55:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 17 Oct 2003 16:46:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Oct 2003 16:33:35 -0000
Serializable Scopes Issues?
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 17 Oct 2003 16:29:47 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 17 Oct 2003 16:27:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Oct 2003 16:17:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 17 Oct 2003 15:19:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances ofevent handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 17 Oct 2003 07:10:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Oct 2003 04:09:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Oct 2003 04:03:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 17 Oct 2003 03:59:14 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 17 Oct 2003 02:02:19 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances ofevent handler
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 17 Oct 2003 01:58:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 16 Oct 2003 23:51:32 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status incase of transitioncondition
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 16 Oct 2003 22:45:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 16 Oct 2003 22:28:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 16 Oct 2003 22:04:36 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
Ashwini Surpur <ashwini.surpur@oracle.com> on 16 Oct 2003 20:04:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 16 Oct 2003 19:24:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 16 Oct 2003 18:03:07 -0000
Ballot on dates for face to face meeting
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 16 Oct 2003 14:51:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 44 - Summary so far.
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 16 Oct 2003 14:05:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 16 Oct 2003 11:29:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - approved proposal.
From
"Trickovic, Ivana" <ivana.trickovic@sap.com> on 16 Oct 2003 09:24:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - approved proposal.
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 16 Oct 2003 06:46:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 15 Oct 2003 23:37:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 15 Oct 2003 20:17:11 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 15 Oct 2003 20:07:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 15 Oct 2003 19:42:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 15 Oct 2003 19:23:57 -0000
IP issues
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 15 Oct 2003 16:56:37 -0000
Groups - WSBPEL Use Case Policy - for UC group review.ppt uploaded
From
hreed@sonicsoftware.com on 15 Oct 2003 15:16:58 -0000
Groups - WSBPEL Use Case Overview - for UC group review.ppt uploaded
From
hreed@sonicsoftware.com on 15 Oct 2003 15:16:10 -0000
Liaison report on UN/CEFACT Business Collaboration Framework (BCF)
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 15 Oct 2003 14:30:58 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 14 Oct 2003 23:01:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 14 Oct 2003 21:52:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Fishing expedition for static check assumptions
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 14 Oct 2003 18:32:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Fishing expedition for static check assumptions
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 14 Oct 2003 17:31:34 -0000
Issue - 74 - ignore or forbid the unneeded joinCondition
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 14 Oct 2003 16:32:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 14 Oct 2003 15:47:24 -0000
Fishing expedition for static check assumptions
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 14 Oct 2003 15:35:31 -0000
Plans for next WS BPEL TC face to face meeting
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 14 Oct 2003 14:48:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 14 Oct 2003 14:41:09 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Yuzo Fujishima" <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com> on 14 Oct 2003 06:19:50 -0000
RE: Issue - 53 - Final end of scopes ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 --proposal for discussion)
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 13 Oct 2003 18:37:32 -0000
RE: Issue - 53 - Final end of scopes ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 13 Oct 2003 17:49:14 -0000
RE: Issue - 53 - Final end of scopes ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 --proposal for discussion)
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 13 Oct 2003 17:36:03 -0000
Issue - 53 - Final end of scopes ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 13 Oct 2003 17:15:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 37 - Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 13 Oct 2003 04:04:42 -0000
Issue 3 - Proposal to vote
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 12 Oct 2003 21:22:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 11 Oct 2003 04:41:48 -0000
Issue 27 - Proposal to vote - Setting link status in case of transitioncondition
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 11 Oct 2003 01:57:13 -0000
Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of event handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 11 Oct 2003 01:57:12 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 11 Oct 2003 01:57:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 10 Oct 2003 22:04:19 -0000
Fw: Oasis TC membership requirements
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 10 Oct 2003 21:42:57 -0000
Agenda for Oct.15 WS BPEL TC call
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 10 Oct 2003 21:38:46 -0000
Groups - 10_01_03_Minutes.doc uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 10 Oct 2003 21:00:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
jim@parasoft.com (Jim Clune) on 10 Oct 2003 20:14:12 -0000
Groups - report_summary.php3 uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 10 Oct 2003 00:21:16 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 9 Oct 2003 22:05:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 9 Oct 2003 21:57:54 -0000
Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 9 Oct 2003 21:57:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 9 Oct 2003 20:45:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 9 Oct 2003 16:35:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 9 Oct 2003 16:32:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 9 Oct 2003 16:21:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 9 Oct 2003 14:08:43 -0000
Issue - 72 - Some proposals
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 9 Oct 2003 11:56:20 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 9 Oct 2003 01:31:29 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 8 Oct 2003 22:43:25 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 8 Oct 2003 22:27:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 8 Oct 2003 22:22:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 8 Oct 2003 22:15:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 8 Oct 2003 20:41:45 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 8 Oct 2003 20:30:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 8 Oct 2003 20:24:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 8 Oct 2003 20:08:36 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
jim@parasoft.com (Jim Clune) on 8 Oct 2003 16:40:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 8 Oct 2003 14:05:03 -0000
[wsbpel] Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 8 Oct 2003 06:03:23 -0000
Issue 3 -- proposal for discussion
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 8 Oct 2003 05:57:45 -0000
Issue - 9 - RE: [wsbpel] Should a correlationViolation be thrown when initiaing a correlation set with missing property aliases
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 7 Oct 2003 23:42:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Should a correlationViolation be thrown when initiaing a correlation set with missing property aliases
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 7 Oct 2003 22:06:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Should a correlationViolation be thrown when initiaing a correlation set with missing property aliases
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 7 Oct 2003 21:26:18 -0000
Should a correlationViolation be thrown when initiaing a correlation set with missing property aliases
From
"Chris Keller" <chris.keller@active-endpoints.com> on 7 Oct 2003 20:55:12 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Dieter Roller" <ROL@de.ibm.com> on 7 Oct 2003 19:32:46 -0000
Groups - Spec Editing Conf Call added
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 7 Oct 2003 13:08:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 7 Oct 2003 09:47:41 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 7 Oct 2003 08:30:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 6 Oct 2003 18:06:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 6 Oct 2003 15:38:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 6 Oct 2003 13:51:10 -0000
Process Monitoring - Common Language
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 6 Oct 2003 08:53:38 -0000
Issue - 73 - "wsdl:fault" element not allowed with one-way operation
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 6 Oct 2003 08:09:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 6 Oct 2003 06:12:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 - Proposal to vote - What to do with WSDL1.2?
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 6 Oct 2003 04:27:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66 - Zero or multiple matches of correlation set)
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 4 Oct 2003 05:21:22 -0000
Issue 47 - Proposal to vote - What to do with WSDL1.2?
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 4 Oct 2003 00:32:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 3 Oct 2003 23:36:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Edwin Khodabakchian" <edwink@collaxa.com> on 3 Oct 2003 23:33:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances ofevent handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 3 Oct 2003 23:17:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 72 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 3 Oct 2003 21:05:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 72 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 3 Oct 2003 20:21:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] policy annotations and BPEL (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 66- Zero or multiple matches of correlation set)
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 3 Oct 2003 16:50:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 3 Oct 2003 15:12:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 3 Oct 2003 15:09:19 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 3 Oct 2003 14:45:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 3 Oct 2003 14:09:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 3 Oct 2003 02:24:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of eventhandler
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 3 Oct 2003 02:10:41 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of eventhandler
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 2 Oct 2003 20:28:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of eventhandler
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 2 Oct 2003 20:00:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances ofevent handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 2 Oct 2003 19:37:17 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of eventhandler
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 2 Oct 2003 19:25:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances ofevent handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 2 Oct 2003 19:20:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Background information about WS-I BP1.0recommendations on use of WSDL1.1
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:50:15 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - Background information about WS-I BP1.0 recommendations on use of WSDL1.1
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:41:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - (really, was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:28:25 -0000
Issue - 72 - Background information about WS-I BP1.0 recommendations on use of WSDL1.1
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:21:30 -0000
[wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:20:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:17:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 2 Oct 2003 17:04:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:03:01 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - (really, was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 2 Oct 2003 17:03:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Oct 2003 16:52:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 72 - (really, was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Oct 2003 15:53:11 -0000
Issue - 72 - (really, was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 2 Oct 2003 11:33:29 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Thu Oct 02 05:58:24 2003
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 2 Oct 2003 09:55:58 -0000
Issue - 72 - ( was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0)
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 2 Oct 2003 09:28:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Oct 2003 03:37:17 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 2 Oct 2003 01:47:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 1 Oct 2003 23:42:01 -0000
New Issues Document
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 1 Oct 2003 21:59:00 -0000
Groups - issuesprocess16.htm uploaded
From
ygoland@bea.com on 1 Oct 2003 21:55:47 -0000
Groups - issuesprocessdiff15to16.htm uploaded
From
ygoland@bea.com on 1 Oct 2003 21:54:51 -0000
UN/CEFACT BCF liaison update
From
"Fletcher, Tony" <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com> on 1 Oct 2003 21:42:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 1 Oct 2003 20:47:08 -0000
Issue - 72 - What to do with WS-I BP1.0?
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 1 Oct 2003 20:12:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 1 Oct 2003 19:37:13 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 1 Oct 2003 19:29:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Oct 2003 19:14:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Oct 2003 19:09:48 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 1 Oct 2003 19:07:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 1 Oct 2003 19:02:47 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:53:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:49:54 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:45:05 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:38:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:35:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Liu, Kevin" <kevin.liu@sap.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:32:13 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:32:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:27:07 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:21:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:16:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 18:07:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 1 Oct 2003 18:06:40 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Wed Oct 01 13:58:18 2003
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Oct 2003 17:53:41 -0000
Action Items for UC group (from TC con-call)
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 1 Oct 2003 17:44:55 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 17:38:11 -0000
Issue - 71 - Removal of wsdl:message
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 1 Oct 2003 17:16:22 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 1 Oct 2003 17:09:49 -0000
Issue 47 and WS-I BP 1.0
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 16:58:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] ZIPPED docs for Use case presentation part of TC call today
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 16:00:05 -0000
irc for TC
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 1 Oct 2003 15:03:57 -0000
Groups - CLEAN example for 2003-10-01 TC concall.zip uploaded
From
hreed@sonicsoftware.com on 1 Oct 2003 14:48:16 -0000
ZIPPED docs for Use case presentation part of TC call today
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 1 Oct 2003 14:45:40 -0000
Issue -23 - Proposal to vote on Issues at Oct. 1 TC call
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 1 Oct 2003 13:07:30 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 1 Oct 2003 12:41:56 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 36 - Proposal to vote - Multiple instances of event handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 1 Oct 2003 05:40:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - possible resolution
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 1 Oct 2003 04:31:08 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 7 - possible resolution
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 1 Oct 2003 04:29:04 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2