< Return to Calendar

* SCA C and C++ Telecon (Conference Call)
Name * SCA C and C++ Telecon (Conference Call)
Time Thursday, 24 January 2008, 11:00am to 12:00pm EST
(Thursday, 24 January 2008, 04:00pm to 05:00pm UTC)
Description Chat Room
http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/sca-c-cpp-TC
Minutes 0. Role

Bryan Aupperle
Andrew Borley
David Haney
Pete Robbins

1. Agenda bashing

2. Accept minutes from SCA-C-C++ TC meeting of 17 January

Minutes Approved

3. Action Items

a. AI-2 (Pete): C++ header files

4. New Issues

None

5. Issue Discussion

a. http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/CCPP-20 C migration
Proposal here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-c-cpp/200801/msg00019.html

Proposal Approved

b. Callback customization: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-c-cpp/200801/msg00015.html

Assembly TC approved removal callback customization from SCA 1.1. This removes the need for the proposal and instead means we need to remove the setCallback() functionality and discussion from our specifications. Bryan to open an issue.

c. Duplication of text from Assembly spec.

Agreed that duplication of text from assembly is not a good idea - especially conformance statements.

6. Conformance Statements:
- Are the current conformance statements appropriate?
- Are the current conformance statements worded properly?
- Are additional conformance statements needed?

Start with Section 11 of the current C++ WD (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/25974/sca-cppcni-1.1-spec-wd-02.doc)

Section 12.2 line 1890: This is a deep copy so all embedded objects copied, including pointer/references to them.

Section 12.2 line 1892: Change not supported to behavior not defined unless allowsPassByReference.

Section 13 line 1902: not => NOT

Section 15: Part of an implementation is a utility for mapping C++ to WSDL

Section 15.1.1: Remove "MUST be" from table (4x)

Section 15.1.2 lines 2061-2061: Remove "MUST be"

Section 15.1.15: David to open issue on handling of complex types in messages.

Section 15.1.16: Reword 1st sentence to be clear about conformance target.

Section 15.2 line 2427: should => SHOULD

Section 15.3 lines 2544-2547: consolidate with page 55 and remove SOAP 1.1 vs 1.2 distinction.

Section 15.4.2 line 2572: must => MUST

7. AOB

Agenda 0. Role

1. Agenda bashing

2. Accept minutes from SCA-C-C++ TC meeting of 17 January

3. Action Items

a. AI-2 (Pete): C++ header files

4. New Issues

None

5. Issue Discussion

a. http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/CCPP-20 C migration
Proposal here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-c-cpp/200801/msg00019.html

b. Callback customization: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-c-cpp/200801/msg00015.html

c. Duplication of text from Assembly spec.

6. Conformance Statements:
- Are the current conformance statements appropriate?
- Are the current conformance statements worded properly?
- Are additional conformance statements needed?

Start with Section 11 of the current C++ WD (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/25974/sca-cppcni-1.1-spec-wd-02.doc)

7. AOB

Submitter Dr. Bryan Aupperle
GroupOASIS Service Component Architecture / C and C++ (SCA-C-C++) TC
Access This event is visible to OASIS Service Component Architecture / C and C++ (SCA-C-C++) TC and shared with
  • OASIS Open (General Membership)
  • General Public