[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: ECF 4.1 Discussions
Seems like criteria against the clause “documents relevant to the filing”. I am not sure the Tyler team was thinking of an error condition as the reason (perhaps) but in my mind was knowing that we do support
filings sans document. Philip From:
McMillan, Jim <jmcmillan@ncsc.org> Philip – what about the scenario if the reason for the error/return message was a corrupted or missing document?
There would be nothing to link to and of course nothing to send.
Should #3 be an error message or notification document from the court clerk?
Just asking? - Jim M From: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Baughman, Philip [WARNING]
This email originated outside the NCSC email system. DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Hello ECF TC members. Upon revisiting/reviewing the ECF 4.1 Comment Resolution Log, we’d like to bring one item back to the TC agenda, for clarification: #27 – NotifyFilingReviewComplete "The operation MAY return the filed documents or links to the documents but MUST include the [FIPS 180-4] SHA 256 document hash, a condensed representation of a document intended
to protect document integrity." Does this mean the operation may do any of the following: 1. Provide the documents 2. Provide links 3. Provide neither If #3 is an option, what is the value of just providing the hash? We suspect #3 is
not an option, in which case we put forth the following for clarification: "The operation MUST provide any documents relevant to the filing either by including the documents or links to the documents and MUST include the [FIPS 180-4] SHA 256 document hash,
a condensed representation of a document intended to protect document integrity." Philip Baughman
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]