Document:
DRAFT-03-20-12-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.odt

Draft (A preliminary unapproved sketch, outline, or version.)

Details

Submitted By Jeff Waters on 2012-04-03 8:38 am UTC

Publication Type

None at this time.

Group / Folder

EM Infrastructure Framework SC / Resources

Modified by

Not modified.

Copy

This document is not a copy.

Technical Contact

None at this time.

Download Count

68

Download Agreement

None at this time.

Description

At the March 20th, 2012 meeting of the Infrastructure Framework Subcommittee, the members discussed the following topics:

1. TOPIC EMFW-5 revisited: Should RefDateTimeSent be optional or required as the third element of the DistributionReferenceType? (Answer: RefDateTimeSent should continue to be required, in addition to the first two elements (RefSenderID and RefDistributionID) whenever DistributionReference is used. Although the date and time a message was sent may not always be necessary to uniquely identify a message, requiring this element helps to ensure uniqueness, avoid mistakes and is generally useful information. )

2. TOPIC: Should we mark issues in JIRA as “Resolved” if we've decided how to address the issue but haven't yet made the change? (Answer: Yes, we will mark any issue as Status: “Resolved” once we have determined how to handle the issue; however, we won't say Status: “Closed” until any needed change to the specification and/or schema has been made, reviewed and approved. )

References:

(1) JIRA DE 2.0 Issues List: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&pid=10084