|
Should the TC accept changes listed in the description to resolve issue 167,
for inclusion in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.3-cs01", and future versions of the specification?
Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following.
If you disagree, please vote No.
If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain.
I move that:
The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue:
Issue #167: Support transitional device for PCIe VF
--------------------------------------
Currently transitional device for PCIe is half baked.
Such as PCIe VF cannot be a transitional device.
A transitional device support for the PCIe VF is needed to expose the legacy interface.
Detailed requirements, use case, and the proposed solution is in the cover letter at [1].
patch link: [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202307/msg00155.html
patch for automation: https://lore.kernel.org/virtio-comment/20230711150135.222793-1-parav@nvidia.com/T/#u
--------------------------------------
The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification:
--------------------------------------
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202307/msg00155.html
--------------------------------------
The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.3-cs01", and future versions of the
specification.
--------------------------------------
Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As
the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by
electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot
in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the
close of the second ballot missed.
--------------------------------------
|
