Description
If/When testing Rich's draft 2.0 XML Schema could you also try this variant which uses complexType extension to let BlockingPerformInteractionResponse and HandleEventResponse share a common "InteractionResponse" super-type? Thanks.
I'm not proposing we structure things this way for the particular response types;- just testing if Web Service stacks support "extension" now. That could eliminate some redunancy from our shema in 2.0.