Ballot Details: Ready for first public review? (CLOSED)
|Ballot Description||The documents at https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/oslc-core/trunk/pub/OASIS OSLC Core Published.zip
should be ready to be submitted as our Committee Specification Public Review Draft. Please have one last look at these documents. If you feel they are ready for public review, then vote yes. This ballot will stay open for 7 days.
VOTING CLOSED: Tuesday, 7 June 2016 @ 5:00 pm EDT
|Open Date||Tuesday, 31 May 2016 @ 5:00 pm EDT|
|Close Date||Tuesday, 7 June 2016 @ 5:00 pm EDT|
|Ballot Type||Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures|
|Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions)||6|
|Eligible members who have voted||6 of 7||85.714%|
|Eligible members who have not voted||1 of 7||14.286%|
|Options with highest number of votes are bold|
|Option||# Votes||% of Total|
|Voter Name||Company||Vote||Time (UTC)||Comments|
|Amsden, James||IBM||Yes||2016-06-01 19:19:00||1|
|Crossley, Nick||IBM||Yes||2016-06-06 19:05:00|
|El-khoury, Jad||Swedish Royal Institute of Technology||Yes||2016-06-07 08:52:00||1|
|Honey, David||IBM||Yes||2016-06-03 15:16:00|
|Johnson, Jean-Luc||Airbus Group SAS||Yes||2016-06-07 09:10:00|
|Sarabura, Martin||PTC||Yes||2016-06-06 19:09:00|
Swedish Royal Institute of Technology
|Yes||I did not read the text. Just browsed through the formats, and here some minor comments (none are showstoppers):
1. I saw 2 (almost identical) folders in the zip file, and not clear which to review? Wouldn't this be confusing for reviewers?
2. Maybe not surprising, but the URL in the links are broken.
3. It could be hard to control, but the formatting to the Shape tables can be improved. The most verbose column "Description" gets least width for its text.
|Yes||We may expect OASIS to request other minor formatting changes in the published zip file.