Ballot Details: Resolve Issue #66: virtio-net: Define possibility to deliver per-packet hash (CLOSED) |
|||||||||
Ballot Question | Should the TC accept changes listed in the description to resolve issue 66, for inclusion in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the specification? | ||||||||
Ballot Description | Please vote Yes if you agree with all of the following. If you disagree, please vote No. If you don't have an opinion, please vote Abstain. I move that: The TC agrees to resolve the following specification issue: Issue #66: virtio-net: Define possibility to deliver per-packet hash -------------------------------------- Feature VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT indicates the device is able to deliver per-packet hash. If negotiated, this extends packet structure to include calculated hash value and hash type, In this case the device also supports commands for configuration of enabled hashes and a key for hash calculation. https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202002/msg00034.html -------------------------------------- The TC accepts the following proposed changes to the specification: -------------------------------------- https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202002/msg00034.html -------------------------------------- The TC agrees to include the above change(s) in specification version(s) "virtio-v1.2-cs01", and future versions of the specification. -------------------------------------- Reminder: A Voting Member must be active in a TC to maintain voting rights. As the Virtio TC has adopted a standing rule to conduct business only by electronic ballot, without Meetings, a Voting Member who fails to cast a ballot in two consecutive Work Product Ballots loses his or her voting rights at the close of the second ballot missed. -------------------------------------- |
||||||||
Ballot Options |
VOTING CLOSED: Thursday, 5 March 2020 @ 10:15 am EST
|
||||||||
Open Date | Thursday, 27 February 2020 @ 10:15 am EST | ||||||||
Close Date | Thursday, 5 March 2020 @ 10:15 am EST | ||||||||
Ballot Type | Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures |
Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) | 4 | |
Eligible members who have voted | 7 of 8 | 87.5% |
Eligible members who have not voted | 1 of 8 | 12.5% |
Options with highest number of votes are bold | ||
Option | # Votes | % of Total |
---|---|---|
Yes | 4 | 100% |
No | 0 | 0% |
Abstain | 3 |
Voter Name | Company |
Vote
![]() |
Time (UTC) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Oracle | Yes | 2020-02-28 11:12:00 | |
![]() |
Google Inc. | Yes | 2020-02-27 22:18:00 | |
![]() |
OpenSynergy GmbH | Yes | 2020-03-02 17:46:00 | |
![]() |
IBM | Yes | 2020-02-28 13:18:00 | |
![]() |
Red Hat | Abstain | 2020-02-28 11:24:00 | |
![]() |
Red Hat | Abstain | 2020-02-28 13:01:00 | |
![]() |
Siemens AG | Abstain | 2020-03-04 16:19:00 | |
![]() |
Red Hat | -- |