Voting Statistics
| Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) | 5 | |
| Eligible members who have voted | 5 of 6 | 83.333% |
| Eligible members who have not voted | 1 of 6 | 16.667% |
Voting Summary by Option
| Options with highest number of votes are bold | ||
| Option | # Votes | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 5 | 100% |
| No | 0 | 0% |
| Abstain | 0 | |
Voting Details
| Voter Name | Company |
Vote
|
Time (UTC) | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Filip, David
|
Trinity College Dublin (ADAPT) | Yes | 2022-11-01 15:40:00 | 1 |
|
Morado Vázquez, Lucía
|
University of Geneva | Yes | 2022-10-18 16:03:00 | |
|
Raya, Rodolfo
|
Individual | Yes | 2022-10-18 15:46:00 | |
|
Schnabel, Bryan
|
Individual | Yes | 2022-10-23 21:19:00 | |
|
Umaoka, Yoshito
|
IBM | Yes | 2022-10-18 15:43:00 | |
|
Souto Pico, Manuel
|
cApStAn SA | -- |
Voter Comments
| Submitter | Vote |
Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Filip, David Trinity College Dublin (ADAPT) |
Yes | I am fine with removing the extension.. Historically, it was kept in not to upset the numbering of other modules in 2.1 compared to 2.0. I suggest to keep section 5.6 reserved for the module that could be brought back in the future.. Cheers dF |