< Return to Ballot details

Vote Details

Ballot: Mark oslc:LocalResouce archaic
Company:
IBM
Vote:
Yes
Comment:
I don't understand why we have both oslc:valueType and oslc:representation, as they are both trying to describe the same thing. So why are they using different enum URIs at all?

If having both does serve a purpose, then oslc:AnyResource should allow a referenced to be inline or reference, and exactly equivalent to oslc:Either. In other words it may be a reference to a URI either in the same graph or another graph to a blank node.