< Return to Ballot details
Vote Details
Ballot: Mark oslc:LocalResouce archaic |
Company:IBM |
Vote:Yes |
Comment:I don't understand why we have both oslc:valueType and oslc:representation, as they are both trying to describe the same thing. So why are they using different enum URIs at all?
If having both does serve a purpose, then oslc:AnyResource should allow a referenced to be inline or reference, and exactly equivalent to oslc:Either. In other words it may be a reference to a URI either in the same graph or another graph to a blank node. |
|