< Return to Ballot details
Vote Details
| Ballot: Do you approve the 5 items comprising the "Accepting Suggested Translations" Proposal? |
Company:SAP AG |
Vote:
Other: accept 1, 2, 3, 4; reject 5
|
Comment:From my point of view, proposal 5 is too vague. It does not seem to be clear, what 'should appear before' means. Does it address the order of 'alt-trans' elements in XLIFF files, or the order in which 'alt-trans' elements get processed by an application? Why don't we add a timestamp attribute to 'alt-trans' rather than going for a convention? |
|
