15-day Public Review for Retail Block & Tier Prices using EMIX 1.0

Note: The URL for the Committee Specification Public Review Draft was updated on 25 June 2012 to include a revised version of the CSPRD that used line numbering on the editable source and the PDF. Both the original version and the updated version are included below.

The OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (EMIX) TC members [1] have produced an updated Committee Note Draft (CND) and submitted this specification for 15-day public review:

Retail Block & Tier Prices using EMIX 1.0
Committee Note Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 02
14 June 2012

Specification Overview:

This Note describes how an application using the EMIX information model can receive Full Requirements Block & Tier Tariffs, (which we abbreviate Block & Tier) and describes how the information can be used by any model rich enough to encompass this sort of price information.

TC Description :

The OASIS eMIX TC works to define standards for exchanging energy characteristics, availability, and schedules to support the free and effective exchange of information. Better communication of actionable energy prices will help enable and expand efficient markets that satisfy the growing demand for lower-carbon, lower-energy buildings, net zero-energy systems, and supply-demand integration that take advantage of dynamic pricing. Businesses, homes, electric vehicles and the power grid will benefit from automated and timely communication of energy price, characteristics, quantities, and related information.

eMIX focuses on methods of exchanging market information consistent with the OASIS Blue approach, encompassing consistency, transparency, and security.

The eMIX TC works closely with the OASIS Energy Interoperation TC and the OASIS WS-Calendar TC, which respectively are developing Web services-based information and communication models for exchanging dynamic pricing, reliability, and emergency signals and information on energy market participation (such as bids), load predictability, and generation, and common schedule information.

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 22 June 2012 and ends 7 July 2012. The specification was previously submitted for public review [2]. This 15-day review is limited in scope to changes made from the previous review. Changes are highlighted in the included diff-marked PDF file.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

URIs:

The complete package of the prose specification document and related files are available in the ZIP distribution file at:

Version incorporating line numbers: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46331/emix-block-v1.0-cnprd02.zip

Originally announced version:http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46328/emix-block-v1.0-cnprd02.zip

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC may be found at the TC’s public home page located at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emix/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be accessed via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home page, or directly at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=emix

Feedback submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC is publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emix-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of EMIX Overview Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [3] applicable especially [4] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emix/

[2] Previous public reviews:
30-day public review, 31 October 2011: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201110/msg00015.html

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emix/ipr.php
RF on Limited Terms
http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php#s10.2.3

15-day Public Review for EMIX Overview Version 1.0

Note: The URL for the Committee Specification Public Review Draft was updated on 25 June 2012 to include a revised version of the CSPRD that used line numbering on the editable source and the PDF. Both the original version and the updated version are included below.

The OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (EMIX) TC members [1] have produced an updated Committee Note Draft (CND) and submitted this specification for 15-day public review:

EMIX Overview Version 1.0
Committee Note Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 02
14 June 2012

Specification Overview:

EMIX is used to identify and to describe energy products that might be exchanged by independent parties in a competitive marketplace. It expresses the technical specifications and price of energy products. EMIX enables many activities, but alone is not sufficient to support energy markets. EMIX has no inherent security characteristics. It is intended for use across multiple industries, many of which have distinct security requirements.

When providing review comments, please use the line numbers in the respective PDFs for each Note Draft.

TC Description :

The OASIS eMIX TC works to define standards for exchanging energy characteristics, availability, and schedules to support the free and effective exchange of information. Better communication of actionable energy prices will help enable and expand efficient markets that satisfy the growing demand for lower-carbon, lower-energy buildings, net zero-energy systems, and supply-demand integration that take advantage of dynamic pricing. Businesses, homes, electric vehicles and the power grid will benefit from automated and timely communication of energy price, characteristics, quantities, and related information.

eMIX focuses on methods of exchanging market information consistent with the OASIS Blue approach, encompassing consistency, transparency, and security.

The eMIX TC works closely with the OASIS Energy Interoperation TC and the OASIS WS-Calendar TC, which respectively are developing Web services-based information and communication models for exchanging dynamic pricing, reliability, and emergency signals and information on energy market participation (such as bids), load predictability, and generation, and common schedule information.

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 22 June 2012 and ends 7 July 2012. The specification was previously submitted for public review [2]. This 15-day review is limited in scope to changes made from the previous review. Changes are highlighted in the included diff-marked PDF file.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

URIs:

The complete package of the prose specification document and related files are available in the ZIP distribution file at:

Version incorporating line numbers: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46329/emix-over-v1.0-cnprd02.zip

Originally announced version: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46327/emix-over-v1.0-cnprd02.zip

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC may be found at the TC’s public home page located at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emix/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be accessed via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home page, or directly at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=emix

Feedback submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC is publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emix-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of EMIX Overview Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [3] applicable especially [4] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Energy Market Information Exchange (eMIX) TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emix/

[2] Previous public reviews:
30-day public review, 31 October 2011: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201110/msg00015.html

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emix/ipr.php
RF on Limited Terms
http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php#s10.2.3

15-day Public Review for OASIS AMQP Version 1.0

The OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) TC [1] members have recently approved a Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 15-day public review:

OASIS AMQP Version 1.0
Committee Specification Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 02
29 May 2012

Specification Overview:

AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol) is an efficient, reliable, wire level messaging protocol supporting common middleware messaging interaction patterns: messaging, request/response, publish/subscribe, transactions, and store and forward. It allows middleware applications to communicate with each other without having to have the same infrastructure on both ends (i.e. it provides vendor neutral communications).

Like all communication protocols, AMQP describes the message syntax and sequence for performing their different assigned tasks. AMQP is capable of being used in both synchronous (point-to-point) and asynchronous (broker based) architectures and is independent of any particular broker architecture. AMQP is of special importance in providing enterprise and cloud messaging services.

TC Description:

The OASIS AMQP TC advances a vendor-neutral and platform-agnostic protocol that offers organizations an easier, more secure approach to passing real-time data streams and business transactions. The goal of AMQP is to ensure information is safely and efficiently transported between applications, among organizations, across distributed cloud computing environments, and within mobile infrastructures. AMQP avoids proprietary technologies, offering the potential to lower the cost of enterprise middleware software integrations through open interoperability. By enabling a commoditized, multi-vendor ecosystem, AMQP seeks to create opportunities for transforming the way business is done in the Cloud and over the Internet.

For more information, see the TC Charter (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/amqp/charter.php) and AMQP Member Section (http://www.amqp.org/) web site.

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 20 June 2012 and ends 5 July 2012. The specification was previously submitted for public review [2]. This 15-day review is limited in scope to changes made from the previous review. Changes are highlighted in the diff-marked PDF file [3].

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

URIs:

The OASIS AMQP Version 1.0 specification is a multi-part specification. The prose specification documents and related files are available here:

OASIS AMQP Version 1.0 complete specification in PDF:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-complete-v1.0-csprd02.pdf

Part 0 : Overview
Editable Source (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-overview-v1.0-csprd02.xml

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-overview-v1.0-csprd02.html

Part 1 : Types
Editable Source (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-types-v1.0-csprd02.xml

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-types-v1.0-csprd02.html

Part 2 : Transport
Editable Source (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-csprd02.xml

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-csprd02.html

Part 3 : Messaging
Editable Source (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-messaging-v1.0-csprd02.xml

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-messaging-v1.0-csprd02.html

Part 4 : Transactions
Editable Source (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-transactions-v1.0-csprd02.xml

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-transactions-v1.0-csprd02.html

Part 5 : Security
Editable Source (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-security-v1.0-csprd02.xml

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-security-v1.0-csprd02.html

XML Document Type Definition (DTD)
http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp.dtd

ZIP distribution file (complete):
For your convenience, OASIS provides a complete package of the prose specification and related files in a ZIP distribution file. You can download the ZIP file here:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-csprd02.zip

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) TC may be found at the TC’s public home page:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/amqp/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be located via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home, or directly at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=amqp

Comments submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC are publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/amqp-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of OASIS AMQP Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [4] applicable especially [3] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification. OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/amqp/

[2] Previous public reviews:
30-day public review, 9 March 2012: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201203/msg00004.html

[3] Redlined diff PDF file: http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/csprd02/amqp-core-complete-v1.0-csprd02-DIFF.pdf

[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[5] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/amqp/ipr.php
http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#licensing_req
RF on RAND Mode

30-day Public Review for Survey of Methods of Trust Elevation V1.0

The OASIS Electronic Identity Credential Trust Elevation Methods (Trust Elevation) TC [1] members have recently approved a Committee Note Draft (CND) and submitted the note for 30-day public review:

Survey of Methods of Trust Elevation Version 1.0
Committee Note Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01
16 May 2012

URIs:

The complete package of the prose specification document and related files are available in the ZIP distribution file at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46276/trust-el-survey-v1.0-cnprd01.zip

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 16 June 2012 and ends 16 July 2012.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

Document Overview:

This document is a survey of trust elevation or transactional trust mechanisms members use or sell at the level of detail they are comfortable sharing. It also contains some Illustrative uses of methods, which highlight the types of methods used or proposed as needed. This document, which is the Trust-Elevation TC’s first deliverable is intended to be used as input to further analysis.

TC Description:

The Trust Elevation Technical Committee will identify methods being used currently to elevate trust of electronic identities by online relying parties and service providers, and similar methods in development or identified in theoretical models. By comparison and factoring of those methods, the TC will propose and describe a set of standardized protocols that service providers may use to elevate the trust in an electronic identity credential presented to them for authentication, at levels of identity assurance or risk mitigation, representing increasing degrees of authentication certainty.

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Electronic Identity Credential Trust Elevation Methods (Trust Elevation) TC may be found at the TC’s public home page:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/trust-el/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be located via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home, or directly at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=trust-el

Comments submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC are publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/trust-el-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of Survey of Methods of Trust Elevation Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [2] applicable especially [3] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Electronic Identity Credential Trust Elevation Methods (Trust Elevation) TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/trust-el/

[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/trust-el/ipr.php
RF on Limited Terms
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#s10.2.3

30-day Public Review for Symptoms Automation Framework (SAF) Cloud Profile V1.0

The OASIS Symptoms Automation Framework (SAF) TC [1] members have recently approved a Committee Note Draft (CND) and submitted this specification for 30-day public review:

Symptoms Automation Framework (SAF) Cloud Profile Version 1.0
Committee Note Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01
8 June 2012

Specification Overview:

This document is an SAF Primer containing non-normative examples of SAF symptoms, syndromes, protocols, and prescriptions, the latter two referencing DMTF Cloud Infrastructure Management Interface (CIMI).

TC Description :
Human experts in specific IT infrastructure and business domains possess substantial knowledge about prevention, remediation, and optimization of systems. However, there is a significant challenge in capturing, combining, and leveraging this siloed knowledge across domains.

SAF is a catalog-based XML collaborative knowledge framework that is designed to address these challenges by automating appropriate responses to changing business conditions and integrating contributions from diverse domains to provide competitive advantage. SAF has applicability in IT and business including cloud computing, service management, governance, security, energy, eGov, financial, emergency management, healthcare, and communications.

Cloud computing, in particular, exacerbates the separation between consumer-based business requirements and provider-supplied IT responses. SAF facilitates knowledge sharing across these domains, allowing consumer and provider to work cooperatively together to ensure adequate capacity, maximize quality of service, and reduce cost. The SAF technical committee considers cloud computing to be an area where the value of existing and developing standards could be significantly enhanced using SAF.

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 14 June 2012 and ends 14 July 2012.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

URIs:

The complete package of the prose specification document and related files are available in the ZIP distribution file at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46249/SAF-CloudProfile-v1.0-cnprd01.zip

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Symptoms Automation Framework (SAF) TC may be found at the TC’s public home page:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/saf/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be located via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home, or directly at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=saf

Comments submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC are publicly archived and can be viewed at:

https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/saf-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of Symptoms Automation Framework (SAF) Cloud Profile Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [2] applicable especially [3] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Symptoms Automation Framework (SAF) TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/saf/

[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/saf/ipr.php
RF on Limited Terms
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#s10.2.3

30-day Public Review for Transport Protocol Bindings for OASIS Energy Interoperation V1.0

The OASIS Energy Interoperation TC [1] members have recently approved a Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 30-day public review:

Transport Protocol Bindings for OASIS Energy Interoperation 1.0 Version 1.0
Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01
16 May 2012

Specification Overview:

The OASIS Energy Interoperation (EI) Version 1.0 technical specification defines EI services and operations, XML, service and operation payloads and service operation interaction patterns. EI payloads can be exchanged using WSDL-based SOAP messages or using other transport protocols. For interoperability, any use of other networking technologies should be profiled and standardized.

This version of this specification specifies standardized exchange of EI messages using the AS4 profile of the OASIS ebMS 3.0 OASIS Standard.

TC Description:
All work of the OASIS Energy Interoperation Technical Committee (TC) is publicly visible through the TCs home page at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/energyinterop, including all correspondence and prior drafts.

The committee includes members representing Independent System Operators and Regional Transmission Operators as well as the ISO/RTO Council, tilities,
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories, building automation standards, market communication, schedule communication, electronic commerce (B2B) and software architecture experts and more.

The work of this committee is built in part on contributions of Requirements for Demand Response PAP09 (NAESB), OpenADR 1.0 (LBL), and business
information requirements (IRC) as well as substantial contributions from members of the OpenADR Alliance.

Energy Interoperation 1.0, completed in early 2012, provides a definition for SOAP-based web services; the specification under review is the first of
several anticipated alternate tranport bindings.

The committee maintains a list of work items at http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP.

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 14 June 2012 and ends 14 July 2012.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

URIs:

The complete package of the prose specification document and related files are available in the ZIP distribution file at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46244/tbp-ei-v1.0-csprd01.zip

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Energy Interoperation TC may be found at the TC’s public home page:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/energyinterop

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be located via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home, or directly at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=energyinterop

Comments submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC are publicly archived and can be viewed at:

https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of Transport Protocol Bindings for OASIS Energy Interoperation 1.0 Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [2] applicable especially [3] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/energyinterop

[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/energyinterop/ipr.php
RF on Limited Terms
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#s10.2.3

60-day Public Review for Test Assertions Part 1: Test Assertions Model V1.0 COS01

Members of the OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC [1] have recently approved a Special Majority Ballot [2] to advance Test Assertions Part 1: Test Assertions Model Version 1.0 Committee Specification 02 as a Candidate OASIS Standard (COS). The COS now enters a 60-day public review period in preparation for a member ballot to consider its approval as an OASIS Standard.

Test Assertions Part 1: Test Assertions Model Version 1.0
Candidate OASIS Standard 01
02 May 2012

Specification Overview:

Test Assertions Model V1.0 specifies the structure and semantics of a test assertion. A test assertion is a testable or measurable expression for evaluating the adherence of an implementation to one or more normative statements in a specification. The model presented here allows for writing test assertions that bridge the narrative of a specification with the related test suite, acting as an intermediary step toward the development of executable test cases.

Companion documents not part of this specification but developed by the TC are available as complementary material:

(1) a primer document, “Test Assertions Guidelines” (Committee Note) as user guide. (http://docs.oasis-open.org/tag/guidelines/v1.0/cn01/guidelines-v1.0-cn01.html)
(2), an XML representation and schema for the model “Test Assertion Markup Language” (Committee Specification). (http://docs.oasis-open.org/tag/taml/v1.0/cs02/testassertionmarkuplanguage-1.0-cs02.html)

Statements of use for this COS were received from Document Engineering Services (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tag/201204/msg00011.html), IBM (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tag/201204/msg00012.html), and Fujitsu Limited (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tag/201202/msg00000.html)

Public Review Period:

The 60-day public review starts 14 June 2012 and ends 13 August 2012.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

URIs:

The prose specification document and related files are available here:

PDF (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/tag/model/v1.0/cos01/testassertionsmodel-1.0-cos01.pdf

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/tag/model/v1.0/cos01/testassertionsmodel-1.0-cos01.html

Editable source:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/tag/model/v1.0/cos01/testassertionsmodel-1.0-cos01.odt

ZIP distribution file (complete):

For your convenience, OASIS provides a complete package of the prose specification and related files in a ZIP distribution file. You can download the ZIP file here:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/tag/model/v1.0/cos01/testassertionsmodel-1.0-cos01.zip

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC may be found at the TC’s public home page:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tag/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be located via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home page, or directly at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=tag

Comments submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC are publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tag-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of Test Assertions Part 1: Test Assertions Model Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [3] applicable especially [4] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

==============
[1] OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tag/

[2] Candidate OASIS Standard ballot
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tag/ballot.php?id=2217

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tag/ipr.php
RF on Limited Terms
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#s10.2.3

Call for Participation: OData Technical Committee

OASIS members & interested parties,

A new OASIS technical committee is being formed. The OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) Technical Committee has been proposed by the members of OASIS listed in the charter below. The TC name, statement of purpose, scope, list of deliverables, audience, IPR mode and language specified in the proposal will constitute the TC’s official charter. Submissions of technology for consideration by the TC, and the beginning of technical discussions, may occur no sooner than the TC’s first meeting.

The first meeting of the Technical Committee will be a face-to-face meeting to be held in Redmond, Washington on July 26-27, 2012 from 9 AM PT to 5 PM PT. This meeting will be sponsored by Microsoft. Dial-in conference calling bridge numbers will be available for those unable to attend in person.

The eligibility requirements for becoming a participant in the TC at the first meeting are:

(a) you must be an employee of an OASIS member organization or an individual member of OASIS, and

(b) you must join the Technical Committee, which members may do by using the “Join this TC” button on the TC’s home page at [a].

To be considered a voting member at the first meeting, you must:

(a) join the Technical Committee at least 7 days prior to the first meeting (on or before 19 July); and

(b) you must attend the first meeting of the TC, at the time and date fixed below.

Participants also may join the TC at a later time. OASIS and the TC welcomes all interested parties.

Non-OASIS members who wish to participate may contact us about joining OASIS [b]. In addition, the public may access the information resources maintained for each TC: a mail list archive, document repository and public comments facility, which will be linked from the TC’s public home page.

Please feel free to forward this announcement to any other appropriate lists. OASIS is an open standards organization and we encourage participation in Technical Committee work by all interested parties.

———-

[a] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/odata/

[b] See http://www.oasis-open.org/join/


———–
(1) Charter for OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) Technical Committee

(1) (a) Name of the TC

OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) Technical Committee (TC)

(1) (b) Statement of Purpose

The purpose of the Open Data Protocol (OData) Technical Committee (TC) is to define an open data protocol for sharing data and exposing data models interoperably on the Web.

The work will focus on enabling:

– The creation of REST-ful HTTP-based data services, allowing resources identified using Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) and defined in an abstract data model, to be published and edited by Web clients using simple HTTP messages.

– Exposure and access of information from a variety of sources including, but not limited to, relational databases, file systems, content management systems, and traditional Web sites.

(1) (c) Scope of Work

The TC will accept as input the following OData V3 core specifications published on 27 April 2012:

– OData
http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData.html
– OData URL Conventions
http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20URL%20Conventions.html
– ABNF for OData
http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20ABNF.html
– OData Common Schema Definition Language (CSDL)
http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20CSDL%20Definition.html
– OData ATOM Format
http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20Atom%20Format.html
– OData Verbose JSON Format
http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20JSON%20Verbose%20Format.html
– Open Data Protocol (OData) Batch Processing
http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20Batch%20Processing%20Format.html

And the following OData V3 extension contributions dated 18 May 2012 (see below for links):

– OData Extension for Data Aggregation
– OData Extension for Temporal Data
– OData Extension for XML Data
– OData Extension for JSON Data

The TC will refine these initial contributions to produce OASIS standard specifications, including necessary supporting documentation.

Other contributions will be accepted for consideration without any prejudice or restrictions and evaluated based on technical merit in so far as they conform to this charter.

The scope of the TC’s work is limited to technical refinements to the features defined in the input contributions and the following features and capabilities.

The features in scope for the TC have been divided into the following categories:
1. Core
2. Extensions
3. Considerations
4. Patterns and Guidance

The TC will focus on delivering the core functionality first, followed by extensions (including any necessary changes to core), followed by patterns and guidance and additional considerations, not precluding parallel work.

1. Core:
Description of a Data-Oriented Service:
– Description of the underlying entity model comprising:
– Types of entities that may be returned from the service
– Properties of entities that may be Simple types, Complex Types, Collections, Spatial types, Enumerations, Stream or navigation properties
– Open entity types whose instances may expose properties not defined in metadata
– Relationships between entities that may be returned from the service
– Sets of entities that may be enumerated, queried, or inserted into
– Nesting of sets of entities within other sets (containment scenarios)
– Functions and Actions exposed by the service
– Containers of sets, functions and actions exposed by the service
– Additional annotations, such as visualization hints and updatability, which may be applied to metadata elements as well as individual data entries
– Binding of a particular ontology provided by shared vocabularies to an entity or property description or instance
– An addressing scheme for addressing metadata elements as required

Interaction Semantics (request types and associated responses) for a REST-ful Data-Oriented Service:
– Hypermedia-driven mechanisms for enumerating, navigating, and updating resources exposed by the service
– Mechanisms to:
– Retrieve entity sets, entries, service documents, individual properties, links between entities, and metadata and service documents
– Navigate through responses split across multiple pages
– Create new entries, media link entries
– Update entries, individual properties
– Delete entries
– Create, remove, and replace links between entries
– Invoke operations (functions and actions) on resources in the service
– Retrieve changes (deltas) from a result, including tombstones for deleted or removed entries
– Batch a group of requests to send to an OData service in a single request
– Conventions for constructing URIs to obtain metadata, identify, query, and navigate resources exposed by an OData service
– Conventions for querying resources exposed by the data-oriented service, including:
– Select, Filter, OrderBy, Expand, Count, Top, Skip
– Built-in String, Math, and Date functions
– Custom functions
– Any/All operations on collections
– Filter by type, casting operators

The core OData protocol shall be designed to support multiple formats. The TC will focus on specific representations for Data-Oriented Service request / response payloads in the following formats:
– Atom
– JSON

Protocol Extensibility:
– Versioning mechanism for understanding rules for processing requests/responses
– Resiliency to future payload and URL convention extensions
– Extensibility points for describing (i.e., through metadata annotations), invoking (i.e., through headers or URI extensibility), and representing (i.e., through payload extensibility) custom behaviors and content
– Namespacing mechanism for vendor-specific extensions

2. Extensions
– Capabilities such as queryability/sortability defined through additional metadata.

– Representation and semantics for aggregation of data supporting multidimensional modeling
– Annotate entity sets and /or entity types with annotations representing analytic concepts such as dimensions, hierarchies, measures and key performance indicators
– Define semantics and operations for querying aggregated data
– Define results format for queries containing aggregated data

– Representation and semantics for temporal data
– Annotate entity sets and/or entity types as representing temporal data with application time periods and/or system time periods
– Support querying temporal types as of a particular time or time range
– Support operations on, navigating between, and updating of temporal entities

– Retrieval and manipulation of properties representing XML documents in OData
– Identify properties that represent XML documents using annotations
– Define query and update operations over XML properties

– Retrieval and manipulation of properties representing JSON documents in OData
– Identify properties that represent JSON documents using annotations
– Define query and update operations over JSON properties

3. Considerations
– Use of free text search across entities and entity sets and representation of results

4. Patterns and Guidance:
– Patterns and guidance for how to do repeatable requests using OData
– Guidance around data authorization model and secure authenticated access to an OData Service
– Guidance for using OData endpoints with cross-origin access (e.g. CORS)
– Prevention of Cross Site Request Forgery attacks (XSRF) when exposing OData endpoints

Out of Scope

The following is a non-exhaustive list provided only for the sake of clarity. If some function, mechanism or feature is not mentioned here, and it is not mentioned as in-scope in the Scope of Work section, then it will be deemed to be out of scope.

The following items are specifically out of scope of the work of the TC:

– Mapping to models, representations or protocols not scoped above
– Adding unnecessary complication to the protocol by extending beyond the scope described above or redefining mechanisms for authentication, encryption, security, cross-origin access, etc.
– State based protocol

Contributions to this TC which are out of scope for this charter may be accumulated and taken into consideration for potential development of a charter for another technical committee that may be created to address future extensions or modifications to OData.

(1) (d) List of Deliverables

The TC has the following set of deliverables:

– OASIS standards track OData core specification(s) to be completed by the TC within nine months after the initial TC meeting:
– OData Protocol
– OData Conceptual Schema Definition Language (CSDL)
– OData ABNF Construction Rules
– OData URL Conventions

– OASIS standards track OData format specifications to be completed by the TC within nine months after the initial TC meeting:
– A JSON representation for OData request / response payloads
– An AtomPub representation for OData request / response payloads
– A Batch processing format

– OASIS standards track OData extension specifications, to be completed by the TC within twelve months after the initial TC meeting:
– An OData extension defining the representation and semantics for aggregation of data supporting multidimensional modeling
– An OData extension defining representation and semantics of temporal data
– An OData extension defining retrieval and manipulation of properties representing XML documents in OData
– An OData extension defining retrieval and manipulation of properties representing JSON documents in OData

Optionally, such other non-standards track deliverables within the scope outlined above, such as tutorials, within twelve months after the initial TC meeting.

Maintenance

Once the TC has successfully produced the deliverables, the TC will enter into a maintenance mode. The purpose of the maintenance mode is to provide minor revisions to previously adopted deliverables, in order to clarify ambiguities, inconsistencies, and obvious errors. The maintenance mode will not functionally enhance a previously adopted deliverable, or extend its functionality.

(1) (e) IPR Mode

This TC will operate under the “RF (Royalty Free) on RAND” IPR mode as defined in the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy effective 15 October 2010.

(1) (f) Anticipated Audience

The anticipated audience for this work includes:
– Vendors and service providers offering products that produce data services.
– Vendors and application developers who consume data services.
– Software architects who design, write and deploy data producers and/or consumers.
– End users implementing solutions that require an interoperable solution for querying and updating data.

(1) (g) Language

TC business will be conducted in English. The output documents will be written in (US) English.

(2) Non-normative information regarding the startup of the TC

(2) (a) Similar or Applicable Work

OData adopts Representational State Transfer (REST) principles for exposing and consuming data from a data-oriented service over Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) based systems. It is based on, and extends, the Atom Publishing Protocol (AtomPub), and defines both ATOM and JSON based formats for representing data to/from the data-oriented service.

OData provides a vocabulary mechanism for defining common ontologies. Schema.org is oriented around defining common schemas for consumer oriented searchable items.

(2) (b) Date, Time, and Location of First Meeting

The first meeting of the OData TC will be a face-to-face meeting to be held in Redmond, Washington on July 26-27, 2012 from 9 AM PT to 5 PM PT. This meeting will be sponsored by Microsoft.

(2)(c) On-Going Meeting Plans & Sponsors

It is anticipated that the OData TC will meet via teleconference every week for 60 minutes at a time determined by the TC members during the TC’s first meeting. It is anticipated that the OData TC will meet face-to-face every 2-3 months at a time and location to be determined by the TC members. The actual pace of face-to-face and teleconference meetings will be determined by TC members. One of the proposers, as listed below, will sponsor the teleconferences unless other TC members offer to donate their own facilities.

(2)(d) Proposers of the TC

Howard Abrams, Howard.Abrams@ca.com, CA Technologies
Paul Lipton, Paul.Lipton@ca.com, CA Technologies
Stan Mitranic, Stanislav.Mitranic@ca.com, CA Technologies

Shishir Pardikar, Shishir.Pardikar@citrix.com, Citrix

Susan Malaika, malaika@us.ibm.com, IBM
Andrew Eisenberg, andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com, IBM
Hubert Heijkers, Hubert.Heijkers@nl.ibm.com, IBM

Pablo Castro, pablocas@microsoft.com, Microsoft
Lance Olson, lanceo@microsoft.com,
Microsoft Michael Pizzo, mikep@microsoft.com, Microsoft

Mark Biamonte, Mark.Biamonte@progress.com, Progress Software
Jonathan Bruce, Jonathan.Bruce@progress.com, Progress Software
Jesse Davis, Jesse.Davis@progress.com, Progress Software
Michael Johnson, Michael.Johnson@progress.com, Progress Software

Ralf Handl, ralf.handl@sap.com, SAP
Martin Zurmuehl, martin.zurmuehl@sap.com, SAP
Gerald Krause, gerald.krause@sap.com, SAP
Barbara Hartel, barbara.hartel@sap.com, SAP

Paul Fremantle , paul@wso2.com, WSO2
Chintana Wilamuna, chintana@wso2.com, WSO2

(2)(e) Statements of Support

Paul Lipton, Paul.Lipton@ca.com
VP, Industry Standards and Open Source, CA Technologies
As CA Technologies’ Primary Representative to OASIS, I am pleased to approve the OData TC Charter, and to endorse our proposers (listed above) as named co-proposers.

Shishir Pardikar, Shishir.pardikar@citrix.com
Citrix
OData specification is an important development in the arena of interoperable web standards. Citrix is excited to support OData and as the primary OASIS representative from Citrix I support creating a Technical committee for this purpose. I approve of the OData TC-charter and am happy to be listed as a co-proposer.

Dave Ings, ings@ca.ibm.com
Emerging Software Standards, IBM
As IBM’s primary OASIS rep, I approve the OData TC Charter, and endorse our proposers (listed above) as named co-proposers.

Ram Jeyaraman, ram.jeyaraman@microsoft.com
Microsoft
As Microsoft’s Primary Representative, I am excited to support the creation of the OASIS OData Technical Committee and its goal of providing open data for the open Web. I approve the OASIS OData TC Charter, and endorse our proposers (listed above) as named co-proposers.

Jaime Meritt, jmeritt@progress.com
Progress Software
Progress Software has reviewed the OData charter and recommends the formation of a technical committee to drive it towards standardization.

Sanjay Patil, sanjay.patil@sap.com
Industry Standards & Open Source, SAP AG
As SAP’s Primary Representative to OASIS, I approve the OASIS OData TC Charter, and endorse our proposers (listed above) as named co-proposers.

Paul Fremantle, paul@wso2.com
WSO2
As WSO2’s Primary Representative, I strongly support the creation of the OASIS OData Technical Committee and its goal of providing open data for the open Web. I approve the OASIS OData TC Charter,

(2)(f) TC Convener

The TC Convener for the first meeting will be Barbara Hartel from SAP.

(2)(g) Affiliation to Member Section

None

(2)(h) Initial contributions:

OData V3 (27 April 2012):
– OData: http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData.html
– OData URL Conventions: http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20URL%20Conventions.html
– ABNF for OData: http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20ABNF.html
– OData Common Schema Definition Language (CSDL): http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20CSDL%20Definition.html
– OData ATOM Format: http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20Atom%20Format.html
– OData Verbose JSON Format: http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20JSON%20Verbose%20Format.html
– Open Data Protocol (OData) Batch Processing: http://www.odata.org/media/30002/OData%20Batch%20Processing%20Format.html

OData V3 extensions, located at dated 18 May 2012:
– OData Extension for Data Aggregation: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46084/ODataExtensionforDataAggregationv1.0.pdf
– OData Extension for Temporal Data: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46086/ODataExtensionforTemporalDatav1.0.pdf
– OData Extension for XML Data: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46087/ODataExtensionforXMLDatav1.0.pdf
– OData Extension for JSON Data: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46085/ODataExtensionforJSONDatav1.0.pdf

See latest issue of OASIS News: 6 Jun

Bimonthly summary of announcements & deadlines

New Discussion List opened for Public Administration Cloud Requirements

A new mailing list has been opened at the request of the OASIS members listed below to discuss a possible new OASIS Technical Committee on Public Administration Cloud Requirements (PACR). Anyone, whether OASIS member and non-member, may subscribe to this list and participate in the discussion. Please see the preliminary statement of scope below for details on this proposal.

The purpose of the list is to determine whether there is sufficient interest to form an OASIS Technical Committee and to collaborate on a draft charter for submission.

The discussion list leader is John Borras. The email address for the list is:

public-sector-cloud-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org.

To join the list and participate in the discussion, send an email message to:

public-sector-cloud-discuss-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org.

The discussion list will remain open until 04 September 2012. The archives of the list are public and can be found at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/public-sector-cloud-discuss/

Please feel free to forward this announcement to other appropriate lists. OASIS is an open standards organization, and welcomes your feedback.

====

DISCUSSION LIST PROPOSAL

Governments at all levels around the world are evaluating the use of, and increasingly converting many of their information and communication technology (“ICT”) systems to cloud and other remote distributed computing services and installations. The nature of these relatively novel systems requires some re-examination of the public policy and government responsibility requirements generally applied to ICT functions on which public administrations rely, including their:

• Safety, reliability and stability;
• Legislative conformance;
• Degree of control and auditability by or on behalf of the responsible public administration;
• Reliance on and vulnerability to single sources, vendors, formats, applications or computing protocols;
• Usability and extensibility of data and data functions by anticipatable stakeholders;
• Portability of data;
• Portability and composability of data functions across multiple systems and clouds operating in concert;
• Cost effectiveness; and
• Skills needs.

The increased speed, functionality, reach and efficiencies sought and availability from cloud computing methods in some cases put unique stresses on the foregoing conventional ICT requirements, and may also give rise to special needs not encountered or well defined in segregated, stand-alone computing installations.

Some work has been done in creating typologies of cloud computing service function levels, and towards models of services; and several recently-formed coalitions have proposed requirements lists at one or another level of cloud activity. However, there is little help available to governments to integrate those lists into common, readily-understood rules that inform tests or acquisition criteria; and little or no openly available, vendor-neutral information mapping such requirements to the rather large but loosely-organized body of existing ICT standards.

The foregoing state of affairs can lead to haphazard, constantly-changing criteria; serious difficulties in comparing or evaluating possible cloud services; accidental data architectures (or none at all); and a failure to take advantage of easily-used but hard-to-fine bodies of existing openly-available work. The proposed Public Administration Cloud Requirements (PACR) TC will draw together a common set of attributes and operational requirements that are relevant to public administrations, at each of the major service levels of cloud systems, and map them to existing open standards and published governmental works that supply methods of measurement and definition.

The committee will develop a set of common required functional elements, and measurable criteria or qualities that should be present in cloud computing services or installations employed by public administration entities, whether purchased, hired or self-created and self-installed. In this context, “should be present” refers to aspects of a cloud service or installation that are likely to be necessary in order to satisfy the public policy aspects, governmental reliability and stability requirements, responsibility to citizens and constituent stakeholders, and broad, platform-neutral accessibility that generally are expected and desirable from useful, long-term government ICT resources.

Proposers:
Belgian SPF Finances (adil.soussinachit@minfin.fed.be), Contributor
New Zealand Government (Colin.Wallis@dia.govt.nz), Contributor
John Borras (johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk), Individual member

Discussion List Leader: John Borras

45-day Public Review for EDXL Situation Reporting (EDXL-SitRep) V1.0

The OASIS Emergency Management TC members [1] have produced an updated Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 45-day public review:

Emergency Data Exchange Language Situation Reporting (EDXL-SitRep) Version 1.0
Committee Specification Draft 02 / Public Review Draft 02
08 May 2012

URIs:
The complete package of the prose specification document and related files are available in the ZIP distribution file at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/46170/edxl-sitrep-v1.0-csprd02.zip

Specification Overview:
This XML-based Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Situation Reporting specification describes a set of standard reports and elements that can be used for data sharing among emergency information systems, and that provide incident information for situation awareness on which incident command can base decisions

TC Description:
The OASIS Emergency Management Technical Committee has recently completed and approved as a Committee Specification, the Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL) Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v1.2 Australia (AU) Profile Version 1.0.

In addition to completing and approving the Emergency Data Exchange Language Situation Reporting v1.0 Committee Specification 02 and advancing it to a second Public Review, it is expected that this TC will also complete and approve The Emergency Data Exchange Language Distribution element v2.0 as a new Committee Specification Draft and advance it also for Public Review.

Public Review Period:
The public review starts 5 June 2012 and ends 20 July 2012. The specification was previously submitted for public review [2]. This 45-day review is limited in scope to changes made from the previous review. Changes are highlighted in the diff-marked PDF file in the review package.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Emergency Management TC may be found at the TC’s public home page located at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be accessed via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home page, or directly at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/form.php?wg_abbrev=emergency

Feedback submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC is publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/emergency-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of Emergency Data Exchange Language Situation Reporting (EDXL-SitRep) Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [3] applicable especially [4] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Emergency Management TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency/

[2] Public Reviews:
45-day public review, 16 November 2011: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201111/msg00004.html

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/emergency/ipr.php
http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#s10.2.2
RF on RAND mode

30-day Public Review for PMRM V1.0

The OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model (PMRM) TC [1] members have recently approved a Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 30-day public review:

Privacy Management Reference Model and Methodology (PMRM) Version 1.0
Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01
12 April 2012

Specification Overview:

The Privacy Management Reference Model and Methodology (PMRM, pronounced “pim-rim”) provides a model and a methodology for:

• understanding and analyzing privacy policies and their privacy management requirements in defined use cases; and
• selecting the technical services which must be implemented to support privacy controls.

It is particularly relevant for use cases in which personal information (PI) flows across regulatory, policy, jurisdictional, and system boundaries. PMRM picks up where broad privacy policies leave off. Most policies describe fair information practices and principles but offer little insight into actual implementation. PMRM provides a guideline or template for developing operational solutions to privacy issues. It also serves as an analytical tool for assessing the completeness of proposed solutions and as the basis for establishing categories and groupings of privacy management controls.

TC Description:

The OASIS PMRM TC works to provide a standards-based framework that will help business process engineers, IT analysts, architects, and developers implement privacy and security policies in their operations.

Public Review Period:

The public review starts 2 June 2012 and ends 2 July 2012.

This is an open invitation to comment. OASIS solicits feedback from potential users, developers and others, whether OASIS members or not, for the sake of improving the interoperability and quality of its technical work.

URIs:

The prose specification document and related files are available here:

PDF (Authoritative):
http://docs.oasis-open.org/pmrm/PMRM/v1.0/csprd01/PMRM-v1.0-csprd01.pdf

HTML:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/pmrm/PMRM/v1.0/csprd01/PMRM-v1.0-csprd01.html

Editable source:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/pmrm/PMRM/v1.0/csprd01/PMRM-v1.0-csprd01.doc

ZIP distribution file (complete):

For your convenience, OASIS provides a complete package of the prose specification and related files in a ZIP distribution file. You can download the ZIP file here:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/pmrm/PMRM/v1.0/csprd01/PMRM-v1.0-csprd01.zip

Additional information about the specification and the OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model (PMRM) TC may be found at the TC’s public home page:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/pmrm/

Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility which can be located via the button labeled “Send A Comment” at the top of the TC public home, or directly at:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=pmrm

Comments submitted by TC non-members for this work and for other work of this TC are publicly archived and can be viewed at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/pmrm-comment/

All comments submitted to OASIS are subject to the OASIS Feedback License, which ensures that the feedback you provide carries the same obligations at least as the obligations of the TC members. In connection with this public review of Privacy Management Reference Model and Methodology (PMRM) Version 1.0, we call your attention to the OASIS IPR Policy [2] applicable especially [3] to the work of this technical committee. All members of the TC should be familiar with this document, which may create obligations regarding the disclosure and availability of a member’s patent, copyright, trademark and license rights that read on an approved OASIS specification.

OASIS invites any persons who know of any such claims to disclose these if they may be essential to the implementation of the above specification, so that notice of them may be posted to the notice page for this TC’s work.

========== Additional references:

[1] OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model (PMRM) TC
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/pmrm/

[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/who/intellectualproperty.php

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/pmrm/ipr.php
Non-Assertion Mode
http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr#s10.3

No results with the selected filters